Evidence the run may read
- Employee question
- Approved policy and process library
- Jurisdiction and employment-context metadata
Draft a response from current approved people policies and route exceptions or individual determinations to a specialist.
Search intent: AI agent for HR policy questions
An employee asks a policy or process question through an approved channel.
people operations owner
A people advisor approves the answer, especially any individual or jurisdiction-specific interpretation.
policy answers accepted first review (percent). Measure drafts approved without a material policy correction.
Each stage produces an artifact another stage can inspect. The final node is a person, not an autonomous write to an external system.
Validate and normalize the people policy answer draft inputs.
Produce the policy-cited answer draft.
Produce the applicability and uncertainty notes.
Challenge the people policy answer draft result and prepare an approval packet.
A people advisor approves the answer, especially any individual or jurisdiction-specific interpretation.
Source material is read-only. Drafts land in a case-specific output path. Tools may read or propose; the human gate owns the external write.
workspace/people-ops/people-policy-answer-draft/inputs/**Read only the evidence attached to this workflow instance.
workspace/people-ops/people-policy-answer-draft/outputs/**Write drafts and evidence artifacts without modifying source records.
people-ops:people-policy-answer-draft:read-or-proposeInvoke only tools explicitly granted for this run; external writes remain gated.
The blueprint starts private, caps its DAG, disables replanning, and exposes no public endpoint. Add only the tools and data adapters this workflow has approved.
name: people-ops-people-policy-answer-draft
version: 0.1.0
entrypoint: agent:BlueprintAgent
expose:
public: false
composition:
planning: deterministic_dag
max_nodes: 6
max_parallel: 1
max_replans: 0Every material conclusion cites an input artifact or a scoped tool result from this run.
The draft cites current policy, protects confidential data, and distinguishes general process from an individual determination.
The run stops at a proposal and records the human decision before any external side effect.
Containment: Return a partial result with unresolved items; do not broaden scope or perform an external write.
Operator: Attach the missing evidence, narrow the brief, or explicitly approve a new scoped run.
Containment: Stop the affected branch and preserve completed artifacts in the case output workspace.
Operator: Grant only the missing resource or continue with that branch marked out of scope.
Current platform receipts sign caller identity or classification, skill, bounded input evidence, verified grant IDs when present, outcome or result preview, and timing. Optional file, tool, artifact, handoff, evaluation, and review fields require separate instrumentation and are not populated by default. Price, fees, payouts, and later human approvals remain separate platform records.
The example uses only fields populated by the current platform sealing paths. It is illustrative, not a record of a real customer run.
{
"receipt_id": "rcpt_01J...",
"schema_version": 1,
"agent_name": "people-ops-people-policy-answer-draft",
"caller": "user:workflow-owner",
"task_id": "case_people_policy_answer_draft",
"skill_name": "people_policy_answer_draft",
"input_hash": "4d7c...9a2f",
"grant_ids": [
"grt_case_inputs",
"grt_tool_propose"
],
"status": "ok",
"result_preview": "Output prepared: Policy-cited answer draft. Human decision remains separate.",
"elapsed_ms": 4218
}Check a proposed role description for clarity, internal consistency, approved requirements, and accessible language before publication.
Validate application completeness and scheduling prerequisites without ranking candidates or inferring suitability.
Assemble an approved competency plan, interviewer assignments, and structured evidence forms for a recruiting coordinator.
Deploy the workflow as a bounded internal agent, verify its outputs and the receipt fields actually emitted, then expand only the scopes your acceptance test proves it needs.