Evidence the run may read
- Submitted interviewer feedback
- Approved competency rubric
- Conflict and decision-process guidance
Organize submitted interviewer evidence by approved competency and surface missing or contradictory observations without recommending a hire.
Search intent: AI agent for interview feedback summaries
An authorized interview loop closes and submitted feedback is available.
people operations owner
Authorized humans make and document every progression, selection, or rejection decision.
decision meetings with complete evidence (percent). Measure authorized meetings with evidence for every reviewed competency.
Each stage produces an artifact another stage can inspect. The final node is a person, not an autonomous write to an external system.
Validate and normalize the interview evidence summary inputs.
Produce the competency evidence matrix.
Produce the missing and conflicting evidence list.
Challenge the interview evidence summary result and prepare an approval packet.
Authorized humans make and document every progression, selection, or rejection decision.
Source material is read-only. Drafts land in a case-specific output path. Tools may read or propose; the human gate owns the external write.
workspace/people-ops/interview-evidence-summary/inputs/**Read only the evidence attached to this workflow instance.
workspace/people-ops/interview-evidence-summary/outputs/**Write drafts and evidence artifacts without modifying source records.
people-ops:interview-evidence-summary:read-or-proposeInvoke only tools explicitly granted for this run; external writes remain gated.
The blueprint starts private, caps its DAG, disables replanning, and exposes no public endpoint. Add only the tools and data adapters this workflow has approved.
name: people-ops-interview-evidence-summary
version: 0.1.0
entrypoint: agent:BlueprintAgent
expose:
public: false
composition:
planning: deterministic_dag
max_nodes: 6
max_parallel: 1
max_replans: 0Every material conclusion cites an input artifact or a scoped tool result from this run.
The summary preserves source attribution, excludes protected information, and provides no automated recommendation or score.
The run stops at a proposal and records the human decision before any external side effect.
Containment: Return a partial result with unresolved items; do not broaden scope or perform an external write.
Operator: Attach the missing evidence, narrow the brief, or explicitly approve a new scoped run.
Containment: Stop the affected branch and preserve completed artifacts in the case output workspace.
Operator: Grant only the missing resource or continue with that branch marked out of scope.
Current platform receipts sign caller identity or classification, skill, bounded input evidence, verified grant IDs when present, outcome or result preview, and timing. Optional file, tool, artifact, handoff, evaluation, and review fields require separate instrumentation and are not populated by default. Price, fees, payouts, and later human approvals remain separate platform records.
The example uses only fields populated by the current platform sealing paths. It is illustrative, not a record of a real customer run.
{
"receipt_id": "rcpt_01J...",
"schema_version": 1,
"agent_name": "people-ops-interview-evidence-summary",
"caller": "user:workflow-owner",
"task_id": "case_interview_evidence_summary",
"skill_name": "interview_evidence_summary",
"input_hash": "4d7c...9a2f",
"grant_ids": [
"grt_case_inputs",
"grt_tool_propose"
],
"status": "ok",
"result_preview": "Output prepared: Competency evidence matrix. Human decision remains separate.",
"elapsed_ms": 4218
}Check a proposed role description for clarity, internal consistency, approved requirements, and accessible language before publication.
Validate application completeness and scheduling prerequisites without ranking candidates or inferring suitability.
Assemble an approved competency plan, interviewer assignments, and structured evidence forms for a recruiting coordinator.
Deploy the workflow as a bounded internal agent, verify its outputs and the receipt fields actually emitted, then expand only the scopes your acceptance test proves it needs.