Evidence the run may read
- Approved account health signals
- Support and outcome context
- Renewal and stakeholder metadata
production blueprint · customer support & success
Customer churn risk review agent blueprint.
Combine approved usage, support, outcome, and relationship signals into a reviewer-controlled risk assessment.
Search intent: AI agent for customer churn risk
Published by a2a cloudProduct-source methodology →
01 · the contract
Start from a bounded job, not a blank chat box.
trigger
A scheduled account review or approved risk signal occurs.
owner
customer experience owner
agent stops at
The customer-success owner approves risk status and any outreach or offer.
KPI · increase
at-risk accounts with an owned plan (percent). Measure reviewed at-risk accounts with a dated owner action.
outputs
Artifacts the run must produce
- Evidence-linked risk factors
- Unknowns and validation questions
- Intervention proposal
02 · topology
Small specialists. Named handoffs. One accountable decision.
Each stage produces an artifact another stage can inspect. The final node is a person, not an autonomous write to an external system.
- 01
intake
Validate and normalize the customer churn risk review inputs.
- 02
health signal analyst
Produce the evidence-linked risk factors.
- 03
outcome gap reviewer
Produce the unknowns and validation questions.
- 04
success manager reviewer
Challenge the customer churn risk review result and prepare an approval packet.
- 05
customer experience owner
The customer-success owner approves risk status and any outreach or offer.
intake→ validated input packet →health-signal-analyst
health-signal-analyst→ Evidence-linked risk factors →outcome-gap-reviewer
outcome-gap-reviewer→ Unknowns and validation questions →success-manager-reviewer
success-manager-reviewer→ approval packet with evidence references →human-approver
03 · authority
Grant the run only what this case needs.
Source material is read-only. Drafts land in a case-specific output path. Tools may read or propose; the human gate owns the external write.
case inputs
workspace/customer-success/churn-risk-review/inputs/**Read only the evidence attached to this workflow instance.
case outputs
workspace/customer-success/churn-risk-review/outputs/**Write drafts and evidence artifacts without modifying source records.
approved tools
customer-success:churn-risk-review:read-or-proposeInvoke only tools explicitly granted for this run; external writes remain gated.
04 · implementation
A private, bounded starting manifest.
The blueprint starts private, caps its DAG, disables replanning, and exposes no public endpoint. Add only the tools and data adapters this workflow has approved.
a2a.yamlsafe starting point
name: customer-success-churn-risk-review
version: 0.1.0
entrypoint: agent:BlueprintAgent
expose:
public: false
composition:
planning: deterministic_dag
max_nodes: 6
max_parallel: 1
max_replans: 005 · acceptance test
Pass only with evidence.
- 01
Evidence traceability
Every material conclusion cites an input artifact or a scoped tool result from this run.
- 02
Risk uses documented account signals and avoids inferring personal characteristics or intent.
Risk uses documented account signals and avoids inferring personal characteristics or intent.
- 03
Approval boundary
The run stops at a proposal and records the human decision before any external side effect.
failure containment
Stop small. Preserve the evidence.
Health inputs are stale, incomparable, or dominated by one unverified signal.
Containment: Return a partial result with unresolved items; do not broaden scope or perform an external write.
Operator: Attach the missing evidence, narrow the brief, or explicitly approve a new scoped run.
A required input or tool grant is unavailable.
Containment: Stop the affected branch and preserve completed artifacts in the case output workspace.
Operator: Grant only the missing resource or continue with that branch marked out of scope.
06 · proof
Sign the run facts. Keep money in the billing ledger.
Current platform receipts sign caller identity or classification, skill, bounded input evidence, verified grant IDs when present, outcome or result preview, and timing. Optional file, tool, artifact, handoff, evaluation, and review fields require separate instrumentation and are not populated by default. Price, fees, payouts, and later human approvals remain separate platform records.
The example uses only fields populated by the current platform sealing paths. It is illustrative, not a record of a real customer run.
ExecutionReceipt · selected fieldsEd25519 token
{
"receipt_id": "rcpt_01J...",
"schema_version": 1,
"agent_name": "customer-success-churn-risk-review",
"caller": "user:workflow-owner",
"task_id": "case_churn_risk_review",
"skill_name": "churn_risk_review",
"input_hash": "4d7c...9a2f",
"grant_ids": [
"grt_case_inputs",
"grt_tool_propose"
],
"status": "ok",
"result_preview": "Output prepared: Evidence-linked risk factors. Human decision remains separate.",
"elapsed_ms": 4218
}related blueprints
Keep the operating model consistent.
Customer Support & Success
Customer support ticket triage
Classify a customer issue, identify missing context, and route it with an evidence-backed urgency proposal.
Customer Support & Success
Support response draft
Draft a clear answer from approved knowledge and case evidence, with uncertainty and escalation stated explicitly.
Customer Support & Success
Refund request review
Compare a refund request with policy, transaction, usage, and prior-case evidence and prepare a decision packet.
put the pattern to work
Start private. Scope the authority. Require the decision.
Deploy the workflow as a bounded internal agent, verify its outputs and the receipt fields actually emitted, then expand only the scopes your acceptance test proves it needs.