a2a cloud
teams with a ledger

Autonomous agent teams, accountable by member.

A team of agents divides labor — a researcher, a builder, a reviewer, each doing what it's best at. But if the 'team' is one process wearing several role prompts, the division is an illusion: shared credentials, shared database, and no way to say which member did what. a2a cloud makes each teammate a separately deployed agent with its own identity, isolated Postgres, scoped grant, and signed receipts. Real division of labor, real per-member accountability.

own DB per member · signed handoffs · per-teammate ledger

0
isolated database per teammate
0
shared credential across the team
0%
per-member signed ledger
the problem

A 'team' that shares one process shares one blast radius.

The promise of an agent team is specialization — each member an expert, working in parallel. The common implementation undercuts it: role prompts in a single process, one credential, one database, one bill. Nothing about that is a team. When output is wrong you can't tell which member caused it; when access is breached every member had it; when you want to change one specialist you redeploy all of them. The org chart says team; the runtime says monolith.

Members are role prompts in one process, not independent agents.
One shared credential and database means one shared blast radius.
Actions and cost can't be attributed to a specific teammate.
Changing one member forces a redeploy of the whole team.
the a2a way

Make every teammate a real, isolated, signed agent.

a2a gives each member the full set of standalone-agent primitives — identity, database, grant, receipts — so a team is genuinely modular and every member is separately accountable.

Each teammate is its own agentCollaboration through signed handoffsPer-member accountability and costAdd or retire members independently

Each teammate is its own agent

Every member of the team is a separately deployed agent with its own identity, isolated Postgres, and skills. Division of labor is real — a teammate's data and failures are its own, not the team's.

Collaboration through signed handoffs

When teammates pass work between them, the handoff carries a scoped grant and emits a receipt. You can prove who asked whom to do what, and under what authority — collaboration with a record.

Per-member accountability and cost

Receipts and cost attribution are per agent, so a team has a per-teammate ledger: what each member did, spent, and touched. Performance and blame both resolve to a specific member.

Add or retire members independently

Because members are independent deployables with their own grants, you can add a specialist, swap one out, or revoke one's access without disturbing the rest of the team.

side-by-side

Role-prompt monolith vs. real agent team.

dimension
one-process team
a2a team
a teammate
A role prompt inside one shared process.
A deployed agent with its own DB, grant, and receipts.
collaboration
Messages passed in memory with no record of authority.
Signed handoffs carrying scoped grants between members.
accountability
The team acted — which member is anyone's guess.
A per-member ledger of actions, cost, and authority.
changing the roster
Edit the shared prompt and redeploy the whole team.
Add, swap, or revoke one member without touching the rest.
questions

Frequently asked.

What is an autonomous agent team?

An autonomous agent team is a set of specialized agents that collaborate on a shared objective — for example a researcher, a writer, and a reviewer working together — coordinating with limited or no human intervention. The strength is division of labor; the weakness is accountability when the team is really one process wearing several role prompts. On a2a cloud each teammate is a separately deployed agent with its own identity, database, grant, and receipt chain, so collaboration stays auditable member by member.

How do teammates collaborate without sharing one credential?

They hand off through signed exchanges. When one teammate asks another to do a piece of work, it passes a scoped grant — bound to an audience, tools, and a TTL — rather than sharing a common key. Each member acts under its own grant and its actions land in its own receipt chain, so the team collaborates without collapsing into a single shared blast radius.

Can I measure and audit each member of the team separately?

Yes. Because every teammate is its own deployed agent, receipts and cost attribution are per member. You get a per-teammate ledger of what each one did, what it spent, and what data and tools it touched — so both performance review and incident analysis resolve to a specific member and a specific signed run, not to 'the team'.

keep reading

Related guides.

All guides live in the guides index.

don't trust the agent

Build a team, not a monolith with hats.

a2a cloud deploys any agent — LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, CrewAI, AutoGen, or custom — so every teammate gets its own isolated Postgres database, an MCP server, an API, a scoped grant, and an Ed25519-signed receipt for every run. Collaborate through signed handoffs, and hold each member accountable on its own ledger.